<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ&#8217;s about Dylan Hicks</title>
	<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65</link>
	<description>Still the Official Website of Dylan Hicks, despite content usurption from his wife</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-51</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 00:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-51</guid>
					<description>My cd collection (housed in cheap Ikea bookcases) is filed by artist, A to Z, and I don't use last names, so here's one section:

Chet Baker
The Clash
Cornelius
Corrosion of Conformity (from my hometown - Raleigh!)
Count Basie
Crosby, Stills, Nash &amp;#38; Young
Curtis Mayfield

When I go into a music store, I get so frustrated by all the arbitrary categories: alternative rock, classic rock, folk, blues, jazz, metal, used, new, imports, etc... I usually know exactly what I'm looking for, but it takes forever to figure out where it's categorized! Why not just list everything by artist, A to Z? These genres are so irrelevant and outdated now anyway. Are the Red Hot Chili Peppers &quot;rock&quot; or &quot;funk&quot;? Is Tom Waits &quot;blues,&quot; &quot;jazz&quot; or &quot;alternative rock&quot;? What is Prince? Oh, he's black, so we better put him in &quot;Soul&quot;. But wait, that Purple Rain song kinda rocks!? Why not mix all our music? Why segregate? End Music Segregation NOW! I'm gonna stage a sit-in at Cheapo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cd collection (housed in cheap Ikea bookcases) is filed by artist, A to Z, and I don&#8217;t use last names, so here&#8217;s one section:</p>
<p>Chet Baker<br />
The Clash<br />
Cornelius<br />
Corrosion of Conformity (from my hometown - Raleigh!)<br />
Count Basie<br />
Crosby, Stills, Nash &amp; Young<br />
Curtis Mayfield</p>
<p>When I go into a music store, I get so frustrated by all the arbitrary categories: alternative rock, classic rock, folk, blues, jazz, metal, used, new, imports, etc&#8230; I usually know exactly what I&#8217;m looking for, but it takes forever to figure out where it&#8217;s categorized! Why not just list everything by artist, A to Z? These genres are so irrelevant and outdated now anyway. Are the Red Hot Chili Peppers &#8220;rock&#8221; or &#8220;funk&#8221;? Is Tom Waits &#8220;blues,&#8221; &#8220;jazz&#8221; or &#8220;alternative rock&#8221;? What is Prince? Oh, he&#8217;s black, so we better put him in &#8220;Soul&#8221;. But wait, that Purple Rain song kinda rocks!? Why not mix all our music? Why segregate? End Music Segregation NOW! I&#8217;m gonna stage a sit-in at Cheapo.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-26</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the reassurance; I guess we were consecrated by the same Mpls/St Paul record subculture!  That's great that you file by genre.  Over the years, I've bought certain used records with the goal of building a broad library for visitors, only to realize that our visitors never show as much interest in our records as I hope.  Oh, well.

I also have a collection of antenna rotors; I'll send a picture someday.

Catch you later, Nina &amp;#38; Dylan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reassurance; I guess we were consecrated by the same Mpls/St Paul record subculture!  That&#8217;s great that you file by genre.  Over the years, I&#8217;ve bought certain used records with the goal of building a broad library for visitors, only to realize that our visitors never show as much interest in our records as I hope.  Oh, well.</p>
<p>I also have a collection of antenna rotors; I&#8217;ll send a picture someday.</p>
<p>Catch you later, Nina &amp; Dylan!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dylan</title>
		<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-24</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-24</guid>
					<description>Dewey Decimal System. Not really, but I do categorize them by genre and alphabetize the respective sections. I've thought about going straight alphabetical and ridding myself of the occasional taxonomical headache, but I generally enjoy deciding where to file stuff. The sections, which frequently are umbrella sections, are as follows:

Classical
Traditional American Mainstream Pop/Easy Listening/Polka
Jazz
Blues
Country/Folk
R&amp;B
Rock/Post-Rock Pop
Showtunes/Soundtracks
International (subdivided by country or region)
Latin
Christmas
Gospel
Comedy
People Talking But Not Necessarily Telling Jokes
Hip Hop
Post-Disco Dance Music (disco generally I put in R&amp;B, sometimes in rock/pop)

I worked at Musicland stores for a long time, which experience has influenced my categorization methods. I'm most interested in placing something where I think a guest would be most likely to look for it, if for instance a guest were trying to pick something to play at a dinner party during which I had surrendered control of the stereo, which I wouldn't. So I file Neko Case in Rock/Pop because her audience is essentially a rock crowd, even if her music sounds more country-ish than Shania Twain, whom I file in country. But then again I put folk (traditional and contemporary, and by &quot;folk&quot; I basically mean white people with stringed instruments, though of course other folk music turns up in International, Blues, and elsewhere) in with country and don't both giving bluegrass its own section 'cause there's too much overlap for me to bother with. M.I.A I put in rock/pop rather than Post-Disco Dance or Hip Hop. I put Lisa Stansfield in R&amp;B, but Hall &amp; Oates I put in rock. John Zorn I put in jazz. Ray Charles I put in R&amp;B. If someone makes a gospel record but did not begin as a gospel recording artist, their gospel record goes with the rest of their records. But if they began a gospel recording artist and then went pop, they get to have records in two sections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dewey Decimal System. Not really, but I do categorize them by genre and alphabetize the respective sections. I&#8217;ve thought about going straight alphabetical and ridding myself of the occasional taxonomical headache, but I generally enjoy deciding where to file stuff. The sections, which frequently are umbrella sections, are as follows:</p>
<p>Classical<br />
Traditional American Mainstream Pop/Easy Listening/Polka<br />
Jazz<br />
Blues<br />
Country/Folk<br />
R&#038;B<br />
Rock/Post-Rock Pop<br />
Showtunes/Soundtracks<br />
International (subdivided by country or region)<br />
Latin<br />
Christmas<br />
Gospel<br />
Comedy<br />
People Talking But Not Necessarily Telling Jokes<br />
Hip Hop<br />
Post-Disco Dance Music (disco generally I put in R&#038;B, sometimes in rock/pop)</p>
<p>I worked at Musicland stores for a long time, which experience has influenced my categorization methods. I&#8217;m most interested in placing something where I think a guest would be most likely to look for it, if for instance a guest were trying to pick something to play at a dinner party during which I had surrendered control of the stereo, which I wouldn&#8217;t. So I file Neko Case in Rock/Pop because her audience is essentially a rock crowd, even if her music sounds more country-ish than Shania Twain, whom I file in country. But then again I put folk (traditional and contemporary, and by &#8220;folk&#8221; I basically mean white people with stringed instruments, though of course other folk music turns up in International, Blues, and elsewhere) in with country and don&#8217;t both giving bluegrass its own section &#8217;cause there&#8217;s too much overlap for me to bother with. M.I.A I put in rock/pop rather than Post-Disco Dance or Hip Hop. I put Lisa Stansfield in R&#038;B, but Hall &#038; Oates I put in rock. John Zorn I put in jazz. Ray Charles I put in R&#038;B. If someone makes a gospel record but did not begin as a gospel recording artist, their gospel record goes with the rest of their records. But if they began a gospel recording artist and then went pop, they get to have records in two sections.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: nina</title>
		<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-23</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-23</guid>
					<description>Are you kidding me? Porn works great as a likening agent. That's what web stats projects are to me. BTW - I'm waiting to have Dylan explain his cataloging system, he does have one. Also you know, this is just the LP side, I'll post a photo of the CD side later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you kidding me? Porn works great as a likening agent. That&#8217;s what web stats projects are to me. BTW - I&#8217;m waiting to have Dylan explain his cataloging system, he does have one. Also you know, this is just the LP side, I&#8217;ll post a photo of the CD side later.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-22</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-22</guid>
					<description>P.S.  Now I'm embarrassed to have likened that to porn.  That sounded sociopathic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  Now I&#8217;m embarrassed to have likened that to porn.  That sounded sociopathic.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-21</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://dylanhicks.com/blog2/archives/65#comment-21</guid>
					<description>OOOOhhhhhhhh, nice, that picture is like porn to some of us record geeks.  I'm feeling an urge to IM a picture of my collection!

I have to ask: are they alphabetized or cataloged in any way?  Mine definitely are not alphabetized, but I'm working on entering them into the computer.  I finally gave most of my 45s to a friend who owns three old jukeboxes (kinda like a permanent loan to a more worthy curator).  They don't look quite as pretty on shelves, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOOOhhhhhhhh, nice, that picture is like porn to some of us record geeks.  I&#8217;m feeling an urge to IM a picture of my collection!</p>
<p>I have to ask: are they alphabetized or cataloged in any way?  Mine definitely are not alphabetized, but I&#8217;m working on entering them into the computer.  I finally gave most of my 45s to a friend who owns three old jukeboxes (kinda like a permanent loan to a more worthy curator).  They don&#8217;t look quite as pretty on shelves, either.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.544 seconds -->
